Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467112›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025

Factors affecting diagnostic imaging decision-making in the emergency department during day and night shifts.

Robert Peter Klein, Gary Velan, Husna Razee, Andrew Coggins, Kevin Lai, Amith Shetty, Noel Young, Michelle Moscova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert Peter KleinSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9944-9080
Gary VelanSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Husna RazeeSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew CogginsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Kevin LaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Amith ShettyNew South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Noel YoungDepartment of Radiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle MoscovaOffice of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia m.moscova@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical imaging use has increased progressively, prompting discussions about its clinical impact. Interventions to reduce low-value imaging have had varying success, as they generally do not consider the influence of the clinical environment on decision-making. Factors affecting imaging ordering decisions by Emergency Department (ED) medical officers (MOs) and how these factors differ between day and night shifts are poorly understood. METHODOLOGY: This mixed methods study was conducted in 2021 at a major tertiary hospital in Western Sydney. Observations and interviews with ED MOs for 20 day-shift and 26 night-shift clinical encounters were analysed to understand how and why imaging decisions were made, along with usage of imaging guidelines. Demographic and clinical patient data (including patient disposition) were obtained retrospectively from medical records to assess the impact of imaging.

resultsDuring night shifts, 18 of the 26 observed clinical encounters used diagnostic imaging, compared with 12 of the 20 observed clinical encounters during day shifts. Factors affecting decision-making during night shifts included limited resources, fatigue, reduced support for junior ED MOs and higher patient load. Interviews suggested CT was more likely to be used during night shifts as a screening tool to expedite decisions and as a substitute for unavailable imaging modalities. In contrast, imaging decisions by day shift junior MOs were influenced by the need to justify their decisions to senior MOs, prompting them to research presenting complaints and imaging indications. Generally, there was minimal reference to imaging decision-making guidelines across both shifts.

conclusionDiffering factors impact imaging decisions by ED MOs during day and night shifts. This needs consideration when designing and implementing targeted physician support strategies and interventions to reduce low-value imaging. Limited resources and MO fatigue should be considered when modifying guidelines/strategies aiming to support MOs during ED night shifts.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingDiagnostic ImagingEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesShift Work Scheduleeducationemergency departmentsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40467112
PMCPMC12322462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.