ArticleBone & joint open2025
Facilitating translation of trial findings into NHS practice : case study of the Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) care pathway.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: The Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) care pathway is a clinically important, cost-effective treatment to improve pain outcomes over one year for people with chronic pain three months after total knee arthroplasty. This work describes the implementation of trial findings in practice at one NHS hospital and the further work undertaken to support national implementation. Methods: Trial findings were presented to NHS managers with a business case for a pilot embedded in usual care. Trial documentation was adapted using the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behaviour (COM-B) model for behaviour change and evidence-based approaches to increase questionnaire responses. Trial sites were contacted to understand their capacity to pilot the intervention. Results: The STAR care pathway was successfully implemented into NHS practice with a screening response rate of 89%. It is now permanently part of usual care at North Bristol NHS Trust. Trial centres indicated that lack of trained extended scope practitioners was a barrier to implementation. The trial manual and training sessions were adapted into an online training package. Conclusion: The STAR care pathway has been successfully embedded into NHS care at one hospital. A toolkit and online clinician training package supports wider implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.