ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Relationships between heart shape, function, and disease in 38,858 UK biobank participants.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-specific shape models to disentangle sex effects and age-associated anatomical variation in biventricular cardiac anatomy.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Statistical Atlas-Based Surrogate Model of Biventricular Wall Mechanics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac functional metrics such as ejection fraction, strain, and valve excursion are important diagnostic and prognostic measures of cardiac disease. However, they ignore a large amount of systolic shape change information available from modern cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations. We aimed to automatically quantify multidimensional shape and motion scores from CMR, investigate covariates, and test their discrimination of disease in the UK Biobank compared against standard functional metrics.
methodsAn automated analysis pipeline was used to obtain quality-controlled three-dimensional left and right ventricular shape models in 38,858 UK Biobank participants, 5149 of whom had one or more diagnoses of cardiovascular or cardiometabolic disease. Principal component analysis was used to obtain a statistical shape atlas and quantify each participant's left and right ventricular shape at both end-diastole and end-systole simultaneously. Systolic strain was obtained from arc length changes computed from the shape model, and mitral/tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE/TAPSE) was computed from the displacement of the valves. Discrimination for prevalent disease was quantified using linear discriminant analysis area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsThe first 25 principal component scores captured >90% of the total shape variance. Significantly stronger discrimination for atrial fibrillation, heart failure, diabetes, ischemic disease, and conduction disorders (p<0.001 for each) was obtained using shape scores compared with volumes, ejection fractions, strains, MAPSE, and TAPSE.
conclusionAutomatically derived shape and motion z-scores capture more discriminative information on disease effects than standard metrics, including volumes, ejection fraction, strain and valve excursions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.