Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40466939›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2025

Pharmacologic Inhibition of Glutamate Dehydrogenase 1 Improves Functional Recovery of Neuromuscular Junctions and Muscle Function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Andreia Pereira-Nunes, Ummi Ammarah, Min Shang, Iris Charatsidou, Himal Sharma, Bruna Pereira Sorroche, Max Nobis, Thibaut Burg, Stijn Verschoren, Frédéric Relaix and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andreia Pereira-NunesLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
Ummi AmmarahLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Min ShangDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Intervention and Regenerative Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Iris CharatsidouLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Himal SharmaLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bruna Pereira SorrocheLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Max NobisCenter for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology, Intravital Imaging Expertise Center, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thibaut BurgDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stijn VerschorenDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Frédéric RelaixUniv Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM U955 Mondor Biomedical Research Institute (IMRB), Créteil, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d'Histologie, Hôpital Mondor, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) Senescence (SENEC), Créteil, France.
Alessio RotiniUniv Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM U955 Mondor Biomedical Research Institute (IMRB), Créteil, France.
Ludo Van Den BoschDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marcello DelfiniLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Emanuele BerardiLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: emanuele.berardi@kuleuven.be.
Massimiliano MazzoneLaboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: massimiliano.mazzone@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presynaptic terminals of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are sensitive to glutamate, which contributes to NMJ plasticity and synaptic neurotransmission. However, the effect of glutamate on neurotransmission and its pharmacologic modulation in muscle pathologies are understudied. In this study, the efficacy of pharmacologic blockade of glutamate dehydrogenase (GLUD)-1 was investigated in mdx mice, a model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The GLUD1 inhibitor R162 mitigated the malfunctioning of NMJs by enhancing glutamate release from muscle fibers and increasing its availability in the muscle interstitium. Glutamate binding to its N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor on the presynaptic bottom of NMJs resulted in the increased release of acetylcholine and functional recovery of the action potential and muscle contraction, ultimately improving muscle performance. Finally, the GLUD1 inhibitor did not affect the homeostatic control of NMJs and the behavior of either healthy or dystrophic mice. This study suggests a promising and feasible therapeutic approach, based on muscle glutamate exploitation, to treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy, an unmet need in the clinic.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsGlutamate DehydrogenaseMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneNeuromuscular JunctionAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGlutamic AcidMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred mdxMuscle ContractionRecovery of FunctionSynaptic TransmissionEnzyme InhibitorsGlutamate DehydrogenaseGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID40466939
PMCPMC12405910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.