ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2025
Drug and therapeutic intravaginal delivery targeting diseases in the female reproductive tract: A mathematical modeling perspective.
Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterial-based extracellular vesicle delivery systems for wound healing: From fabrication to applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Controlled-release herbicide spheres: co-crystallization of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid with l-menthol via green oiling-out process for low leaching and high activity.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Clotrimazole-loaded PLGA microparticles for local drug delivery to the vagina: Shape does matter.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Female Reproductive Tract Organ-on-Chips: Modeling Barrier Function and Drug Transport.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intravaginal drug and therapeutic delivery targeting diseases in the female reproductive tract is advantageous, yet presents significant challenges due to unique anatomical features, cyclic variations, and a complex microbial ecosystem. Disruption of the intricate vaginal environment due to dysbiosis or infection can decrease immune protection and lead to infertility and pregnancy complications. A variety of intravaginal drug delivery systems (DDS) including creams, gels, suppositories, tablets, rings, and films have been developed to address these conditions. However, relying solely on empirical methods to design and evaluate DDS composition and geometry, as well as dosing regimens, would be costly and time intensive. To address these challenges, mathematical modeling has recently emerged as a complementary tool to systematically evaluate intravaginal DDS performance as a function of drug diffusion, reactions, and biomechanical interactions. This review summarizes how the application of mass conservation and the integration of mechanistic and empirical methods can offer insight into DDS pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Models describing first-order kinetics, microbial interactions, formulation optimization, rheological behavior, and interactions with the vaginal environment are critically evaluated. It is shown that these models can systematically evaluate how various physical phenomena such as diffusion, swelling, dilution, surface slip, and mechanical compression interact to shape spatiotemporal patterns of drug release, permeability, and microbial dynamics. Challenges and limitations of current approaches as well as emerging technologies are discussed, with the goal to provide insight into how mathematical modeling could benefit the development of effective intravaginal therapies addressing female reproductive tract diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.