Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40466063›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Determining the Requirements of Vulnerable Groups for Health Counseling and Optimizing the Evaluation of Health Consultations: Mixed Methods Study With the Use of AI.

Annina Boehm-Fischer, Luzi M Beyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annina Boehm-FischerAlice-Salomon-Hochschule Berlin, Alice-Samolon-Platz 5, Berlin, 12627, Germany, 49 30939397 ext 720.ORCID 0000-0001-7856-4699
Luzi M BeyerAlice-Salomon-Hochschule Berlin, Alice-Samolon-Platz 5, Berlin, 12627, Germany, 49 30939397 ext 720.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-420X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evaluating health counseling services is crucial for ensuring their quality and effectiveness. However, this process is hampered by challenges such as language barriers and limited awareness of their needs and concerns. Objective: The studies aimed to enhance and digitize an existing paper-and-pencil evaluation form for a health counseling service while gaining insights into client needs and barriers. This effort intends to adapt a health care facility's offerings to better meet client demands and implement a multilingual format for greater accessibility. Methods: The research team designed and conducted an in-depth interview study with clients of a health counseling service to gather new information. The insights regarding client demands, wishes, and social needs were used to revise and supplement the existing 1-page questionnaire (originally in German) for evaluating counseling sessions. Using artificial intelligence, the team transformed the new 3-page questionnaire into easy language with a Kunin smiley scale, translated it into 7 other languages, and created audio recordings for all questions in each language. The questionnaire was then programmed into an web-based tool, allowing data collection both on-site with tablets and through integration into the counseling service's website. This digital format is now continuously used to adapt the counseling service to clients' needs. Results: A total of 18 clients participated in the in-depth interviews, which were conducted in their native languages whenever possible and lasted between 8 and 30 minutes. The results indicated that many clients attending the counseling center are burdened by physical and mental health issues, with a significant portion of the assistance provided focused on helping clients complete various forms required by health insurance providers and medical professionals. Despite these challenges, clients expressed a high level of satisfaction with the health counseling services they received. The revised and supplemented web-based questionnaire has been completed by 41 clients. Evaluation results revealed that only 21 respondents (51%) filled out the questionnaire in the national language (German), while English and Arabic were the next most common choices, each used by 6 clients (15%). Findings regarding health burdens and the need for assistance were reaffirmed, highlighting that clients' self-perception regarding their ability for self-help is notably low. Conclusions: Contrary to previous assumptions, it was found that client interests predominantly lie in receiving help with the excessive demands imposed by institutional forms and requirements rather than solely addressing health issues. Clients showed strong satisfaction with the advice received and emphasized the necessity for multilingual health counseling services and evaluations. There is a distinct need for support in completing forms for doctors and health insurance applications. In addition, many clients expressed a lack of confidence in managing health care processes independently in the future, underscoring the need for greater awareness of available resources and support networks.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCounselingVulnerable PopulationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaireshealth counseling servicehealth service evaluationimmigrant healthmixed methodsonline questionnairevulnerable populations, in-depth interviews

Identifiers

PMID40466063
PMCPMC12157954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.