ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Turkish reliability and validity of Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire, which assesses the experiences of patients receiving neurorehabilitation.
methodsNeurological patients receiving rehabilitation between October 2023 and August 2024 were included in the study. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and using the test-retest method to measure stability. Validity was assessed through construct and criterion validity with convergent validity tested with the Patient Care and Rehabilitation Perception Scale in Elderly Patients.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 54.88 years and BMI was 28.55. The test-retest reliability of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire showed a strong positive correlation (r=0.932, p<0.001), demonstrating the stability of the scale. A moderate, significant correlation was found between Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire and Perception of Patient Care and Rehabilitation in Older Patients Scale scores (r=0.440, p<0.001). Moreover, both the first and second assessments of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire were positively correlated with the corresponding Perception of Patient Care and Rehabilitation in Older Patients Scale assessments, strengthening the convergent validity of the questionnaire.
conclusionThe Turkish version of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring neurorehabilitation experience in Turkish-speaking patients. The application of this questionnaire in clinical settings may improve patient-centered care by facilitating a better understanding of patient experiences and satisfaction in neurorehabilitation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.