ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Elevated ctDNA Tumor Fraction Is Associated with Improved Mutation Detection but Worse Overall Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Lung-MAP Study.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- The Pan-Tumor Landscape of Gene Amplifications and Copy Number Amplification Ratio for Established and Emerging Clinical Targets.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Clinical Liquid Biopsy Testing for Detection of Actionable Genomic Alterations in Children and Young Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors on the GAIN Study.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer immunotherapy: prognostic marker today, predictive tool tomorrow?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposectDNA is a powerful diagnostic companion to tissue profiling. Tumor fraction (TF) is a global assessment of an individual's ctDNA burden. We evaluated the impact of plasma TF on mutation detection and clinical outcomes in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer on the Lung Master Protocol (Lung-MAP). EXPERIMENTAL
designPaired tumor tissue and plasma were collected prospectively from patients on the Lung-MAP study. Plasma was collected within 30 days of a new biopsy with no intervening therapies. Tissue and ctDNA genomic profiling and ctDNA TF levels were assessed by Foundation Medicine. TF was primarily calculated from tumor aneuploidy, defaulting to fragmentomics and maximum somatic allele frequencies when aneuploidy was not detectable. The effect of TF on tissue-plasma mutation concordance, overall survival, and its relation to variant allele frequencies was assessed using linear regression, Lin's coefficient, and Cox modeling/log-rank testing.
resultsA total of 194 patients were eligible for analysis. TF ≥1% was significantly associated with improved positive percent agreement between ctDNA and tissue across multiple alteration types with the exception of copy-number gains. For short variants, positive percent agreement improved from 51% when TF <1% to 95% when TF ≥1%. TF showed a significant robust correlation with variant allele frequency for KRAS, STK11, and TP53-the three most common mutations. TF <1% was significantly associated with improved patient overall survival compared with TF ≥1% or TF ≥10%.
conclusionsTF provides an accurate, clinically useful assessment of ctDNA plasma levels from patients with refractory, advanced non-small cell lung cancer. TF levels ≥1% are associated with significantly worse overall survival but improved mutation detection in liquid biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.