ArticlePloS one2025
Nutritional status of healthcare professionals in primary health and social care.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Educational Workplace Dietary Interventions and Occupational Well-Being Among Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Association of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use With Nutrient Deficiencies: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Sex-specific associations between dietary nutrient intake and cardiometabolic biomarkers in older adults with diet-related chronic diseases.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Exploring dietary behaviors among healthcare providers: based on association rule mining.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Balanced nutrition is crucial for healthcare workers' health and performance. Despite extensive knowledge of healthy eating, they face organizational and behavioral barriers leading to suboptimal diets. This study aimed to compare anthropometric status and dietary intake among male physicians, female physicians, and nurses in primary healthcare, and to identify deficiencies or excesses of key nutrients. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in six clinics in Karaganda (2023-2024), involving 202 participants (22 male physicians, 67 female physicians, and 113 nurses). Body composition (weight, fat percentage, muscle mass, bone mass, metabolic age) was assessed via Tanita BC-418MA bioelectrical impedance. Dietary intake was measured using repeated 24-hour recalls for proteins, fats, carbohydrates, fiber, vitamins, and minerals. Statistical analysis included nonparametric methods (Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's test) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results showed insufficient intake of proteins, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, calcium, potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, and vitamins B₁, B₂, PP, and C. Sodium intake was excessive in all groups, whereas iron deficiency was observed only in women. Male physicians had higher body weight, muscle mass, and bone mass than female groups, but there were no significant differences in BMI, metabolic age, or overall dietary composition among the groups. Female physicians consumed slightly more vitamin C than nurses. In conclusion, gender and professional role minimally influenced dietary patterns among primary healthcare workers. Despite mostly normal BMI values, the pervasive lack of essential nutrients, coupled with high sodium and fat consumption, emphasizes the need for institutional measures such as structured schedules and healthier food options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.