Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465742›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Factors underlying international doctoral students' English academic writing abilities.

Wai Mar Phyo, Marianne Nikolov, Ágnes Hódi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wai Mar PhyoUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-7167
Marianne NikolovDepartment of English Applied Linguistics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-4729
Ágnes HódiDepartment of Kindergarten Teacher Training, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to write academic texts in English requires both knowledge of academic writing conventions and expertise in academic discourse to address the needs and expectations of the target academic audience in respective disciplines (Hyland, 2018). This study investigates the relationship between non-native English-speaking doctoral students' English academic writing abilities and various factors, including their English literacy background, research knowledge, ability to read and critically evaluate academic texts, coping with emotional challenges such as stress and anxiety, as well as feedback and motivation. A total of 255 international doctoral students, speaking 49 different first languages, participated in the study. Data were collected via a survey with items presented on a 1-6 Likert scale following Dörnyei and Dewaele (2022). The analysis revealed the significant impact of English literacy background, initial academic writing abilities, and research knowledge on students' self-assessment of academic writing skills and research competence at the outset of their doctoral studies. While prior experience in academic writing proved beneficial, it did not always translate into significant improvements in current writing abilities or research knowledge at later stages. Feedback from advisors and doctoral research course instructors emerged as vital components in supporting academic reading and motivation throughout their doctoral journey. However, the quality of peer feedback appeared to have less impact on students' academic performance and psychological state. Overall, these findings underscore the complexity of factors influencing academic writing and research competence among NNES doctoral students, suggesting the importance of tailored support and interventions to enhance their scholarly development.

Indexed as

Education, GraduateStudentsWritingAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40465742
PMCPMC12136304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.