ArticlePloS one2025
Application of ConvNeXt with transfer learning and data augmentation for malaria parasite detection in resource-limited settings using microscopic images.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated detection and segmentation of Weiss ring in fundus photography images using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Macular hole detection and segmentation on fundus photography using large multimodal generative models for synthetic augmentation.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Machine learning assisted malaria detection using photonic crystal fibre optical sensors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Semantic Explanation for Malaria Diagnosis: Comparing Human and Machine Generated Annotations forIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Fusion of ConvNeXt-Tiny and Swin-Tiny backbones: a comparative analysis for diabetic retinopathy classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Combination Ensemble and Explainable Deep Learning Framework for High-Accuracy Classification of Wild Edible Macrofungi.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria continues to be a severe health problem across the globe, especially within resource-limited areas which lack both skilled diagnostic personnel and diagnostic equipment. This study investigates the use of deep learning diagnosis for malaria through ConvNeXt models that incorporate transfer learning techniques with data augmentation methods for better model performance and transferability. A total number of 606276 thin blood smear images served as the final augmented dataset after the initial 27558 images underwent augmentation. The ConvNeXt Tiny model, version V1 Tiny, achieved an accuracy of 95.9%.; however, the upgraded V2 Tiny Remod version exceeded this benchmark, reaching 98.1% accuracy. The accuracy rate measured 61.4% for Swin Tiny, ResNet18 reached 62.6%, and ResNet50 obtained 81.4%. The combination of label smoothing with the AdamW optimiser produced a model which exhibited strong robustness as well as generalisability. The enhanced ConvNeXt V2 Tiny model combined with data augmentation, transfer learning techniques and explainability frameworks demonstrate a practical solution for malaria diagnosis that achieves high accuracy despite limitations of access to large datasets and microscopy expertise, often observed in resource-limited regions. The findings highlight the potential for real-time diagnostic applications in remote healthcare facilities and the viability of ConvNeXt models in enhancing malaria diagnosis globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.