ArticlePloS one2025
Speech-in-noise recognition as a predictor of academic achievement.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Lateralization, Age, and Sex on Frequency Following Response in Children: Neural Speech Encoding to a 170 ms [da] Stimulus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Abnormal auditory neural activity in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy.Brain communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe capacity to listen effectively greatly influences learning. Speech understanding in noise, a crucial element of listening, involves the ability to comprehend and interpret speech despite surrounding auditory distractions or background noise. While numerous studies have examined the effect of noise on academic success, there is a noticeable lack of research focusing on how a student's skill in understanding speech amidst noise connects to their unique educational achievements and overall learning journey. This study explores the relationship between listening ability and educational achievement.
design108 primary school aged children; 55 from Grade 3 (mean age of 8 years 9 months) and 53 from Grade 5 (mean age of 10 years 7 months) participated in this study. Children completed both a listening skills assessment, using the Sound Scouts platform and the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). Interactions between results were explored.
resultsA significant interaction between speech-in-noise ability and reading was seen in the combined cohort. When exploring interactions between variables within year levels, significant correlations between literacy (reading, grammar/punctuation, writing and spelling) outcomes, but not numeracy, were found in the Grade 3 children. No significant interaction between listening skills and academic achievement were observed in the Grade 5 cohort. SUMMARY: The link between speech-in noise ability and literacy development provides insight into overlapping processes in both skills and their developmental trajectories. This highlights the importance of identifying not only the role that noise itself plays in learning, but the skills that support the ability to manage classroom listening environments. This research has implications for early hearing screening programs, teaching approaches, and interventions focused on enhancing the learning environment for all students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.