Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465674›Full record

ArticleMedical care2025

Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type Associated With Lung Cancer Screening.

Kris Wain, Mahesh Maiyani, Nikki M Carroll, Rafael Meza, Robert T Greenlee, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Michelle R Odelberg, Caryn Oshiro, Debra P Ritzwoller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kris WainInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0003-0260-1523
Mahesh MaiyaniInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Nikki M CarrollInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Robert T GreenleeMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, WI.
Christine Neslund-DudasHenry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI.
Michelle R OdelbergInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Caryn OshiroCenter for Integrated Healthcare Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
Debra P RitzwollerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO.

Funding

Center for Research to Optimize Precision Lung Cancer Screening in Diverse PopulationsUM1CA221939 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI RITZWOLLER, DEBRA P, VACHANI, ANIL · 2018 to 2023
$15.3M
Natural History of Lung Cancer Diagnosed Within and Across Diverse Health Systems Implementing Lung Cancer ScreeningR50CA251966 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CARROLL, NIKKI · 2020 to 2024
$751k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA251966NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA221939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer screening (LCS) enhances early stage cancer detection; however, its impact on health care costs in real-world clinical settings is not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess changes in health care costs during the 12 months before LCS compared with the 12 months after.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed health care costs based upon Medicare's fee-for-service reimbursement system using data from the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium. We included individuals who met age and smoking LCS eligibility criteria and were engaged within 4 health care systems between February 5, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Generalized linear models estimated health care costs from the payer perspective during 12 months prior and 12 months post baseline LCS. We compared these costs to eligible individuals who did not receive LCS. Secondary analyses examined costs among the sample who completed LCS by positive versus negative scan results. We reported mean predicted costs with average values for all other explanatory variables.

resultsWe identified 10,049 eligible individuals who received baseline LCS and 15,233 who did not receive LCS. Receipt of LCS was associated with additional costs of $3698 compared with individuals not receiving LCS. Secondary analyses found costs increased by $11,664 among individuals with positive scans; however, no increases occurred among individuals with negative scans.

conclusionThese findings suggest LCS was only associated with increased health care costs among patients with a positive scan. LCS is a potentially cost-effective approach to identify early stage lung cancer. Healthcare systems should prioritize strategies to improve LCS participation.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Care CostsLung NeoplasmsMass ScreeningAgedFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesEconomic EvaluationHealthcare System CostsLung Cancer Screening

Identifiers

PMID40465674
PMCPMC12767618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.