ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Adaptation across the 2D population code explains the spatially distributive nature of motor learning.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In current computational models on oculomotor learning 'the' movement vector is adapted in response to targeting errors. However, for saccadic eye movements, learning exhibits a spatially distributive nature, i.e. it transfers to surrounding positions. This adaptation field resembles the topographic maps of visual and motor activity in the brain and suggests that learning does not act on the population vector but already on the level of the 2D population response. Here we present a population-based gain field model for saccade adaptation in which sensorimotor transformations are implemented as error-sensitive gain field maps that modulate the population response of visual and motor signals and of the internal saccade estimate based on corollary discharge (CD). We fit the model to saccades and visual target localizations across adaptation, showing that adaptation and its spatial transfer can be explained by locally distributive learning that operates on visual, motor and CD gain field maps. We show that 1) the scaled locality of the adaptation field is explained by population coding, 2) its radial shape is explained by error encoding in polar-angle coordinates, and 3) its asymmetry is explained by an asymmetric shape of learning rates along the amplitude dimension. Learning exhibits the highest peak rate, the widest spatial extension and a pronounced asymmetry in the motor domain, while in the visual and the internal saccade domain learning appears more localized. Moreover, our results suggest that the CD-based internal saccade representation has a response field that monitors only part of the ongoing saccade changes during learning. Our framework opens the door to study spatial generalization and interference of learning in multiple contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.