Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465569›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Isolating single cycles of neural oscillations in population spiking.

Ehsan Sabri, Renata Batista-Brito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ehsan SabriDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-106X
Renata Batista-BritoDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Long-range inhibitory neuron circuit organization and cortical functionR01EY034617 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Renata Batista-Brito · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Role of spontaneous activity towards the assembly and function of neocortical circuitsR01EY034310 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BATISTA-BRITO, RENATA · 2023 to 2025
$1.6M
Investigating abnormalities in top-down cortical processing and behavior in a model of the 22q11.2 deletionR21MH133097 · NIMH · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BATISTA-BRITO, RENATA · 2023 to 2024
$462k
National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01EY034310National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01EY034617National Institutes of Health (NIH) R21MH133097NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034310NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034617NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH133097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural oscillations are prominent features of brain activity, characterized by frequency-specific power changes in electroencephalograms (EEG) and local field potentials (LFP). These oscillations also appear as rhythmic coherence across brain regions. While the identification of oscillations has primarily relied on EEG and LFP, they are also present in neuronal spiking. However, several questions remain unanswered: How do spiking oscillations relate to field potential oscillations? How are spiking oscillations correlated across brain regions? And how are they connected to other physiological and behavioral measures. In this study, we explore the potential to detect individual cycles of neural rhythms solely through the spiking activity of neurons, leveraging recent advances in the high-density recording of large neuronal populations within local networks. The pooled spiking rate of many neurons within a local population reflects shared variation in the membrane potential of nearby neurons, allowing us to identify cyclic patterns. To achieve this, we utilize a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, pre-trained on synthetic data, to effectively isolate and align individual cycles of neural oscillations in the spiking of a densely recorded population of neurons. We applied this approach to robustly isolate specific neural cycles across various brain regions in mice, covering a broad range of timescales, from gamma rhythms to ultra-slow rhythms lasting up to hundreds of seconds. These ultra-slow rhythms, often underrepresented in the LFP, were also detected in behavioral measures of arousal, such as pupil size and mouse facial motion. Interestingly, these rhythms showed delayed coherence with corresponding rhythms in the population spiking activity. Using these isolated neural cycles, we addressed two key questions: 1) How can we account for biological variation in neural signal transmission timing across trials during the sensory stimulation experiments? By isolating gamma cycles driven by sensory input, we achieved a more accurate trial alignment in the sensory stimulation experiments conducted in the primary visual cortex (V1) of mice. This alignment accounts for biological variability in sensory signal transmission times from the retina to V1 across trials, enabling a clearer understanding of neural dynamics in response to sensory stimuli. 2) How do spiking correlations across brain regions vary by timescale? We used the distinct spiking cycles in simultaneously recorded brain regions to examine the correlation of spiking across brain regions, separately for different timescales. Our findings revealed that the delays in population spiking between brain regions vary depending on the brain regions involved and the timescale of the oscillations. This work demonstrates the utility of population spiking activity for isolating neural rhythms, providing insights into oscillatory dynamics across brain regions and their relationship to physiological and behavioral measures.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsBrainComputational BiologyElectroencephalographyMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BL

Identifiers

PMID40465569
PMCPMC12136316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.