ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring burnout and staff turnover among acute care nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a qualitative assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Burnout to Resilience: Addressing Moral Injury in Nursing Through Organizational Innovation in the Post-Pandemic Era.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealthcare worker burnout and turnover are urgent issues that negatively impact workers and have the potential to impact patient care. To highlight potential factors leading to burnout and turnover among healthcare workers, focus groups were conducted with nurses and physicians who previously worked in acute care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic but have since left their careers providing direct patient care.
methodsDuring May and June of 2023, voluntary focus groups were held over Zoom with acute care nurses and physicians who left their careers providing direct patient care. The focus groups each lasted approximately 30 minutes and included 8 or 9 participants. Open-ended prompts used to guide the discussions focused on what led participants to leave their positions and what would need to change for them to return to a role providing direct patient care. The discussions were coded by a team of coders, and then codes were grouped into corresponding themes. Participant demographics were summarized by role.
resultsThe 49 focus group participants included 24 physicians (49%) and 25 nurses (51%). Seven convergent themes emerged during the discussions, including the mental toll of their positions, inadequate staffing, the current state of the healthcare system overall, the ways that the COVID-19 pandemic specifically made their jobs harder, support from facility administration, respect and value for their positions, and pay and incentives.
conclusionsFocus group discussions held with physicians and nurses highlighted multiple factors that led to their decisions to leave their careers providing direct patient care. While more research is needed on the efficacy of specific interventions to address the issues highlighted by participants, various tools and resources are available from multiple organizations to begin to support healthcare facilities in improving the experiences of healthcare workers with the goal of preventing burnout and turnover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.