ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
Social brain responses to natural scene images of social interactions.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Naturalistic stimuli in neuroimaging studies of autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- A conserved node degree-based backbone and flexible hub organization of brain connectome during naturalistic movie watching.NeuroImage · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research reveals that human occipitotemporal 'social brain' regions that are selective for images of individual faces and bodies are also sensitive to visual cues of social interaction. Earlier studies mainly contrasted observing dyadic interactions with non-interactive controls, emphasizing the interacting/non-interacting distinction to observers, and lacking the variety seen in natural settings. To address these limitations, we analysed a 7 T fMRI data set in which participants viewed many naturalistic images while performing a memory task. We focused on 182 scenes containing at least two individuals, and used localizers to identify face- and body-selective regions of interest (ROIs). Brain responses to each image were measured, and the depiction of social interaction was rated by independent observers. Control measures were gathered, per image, for the number of people, their surface area and distribution, and their implied animatedness. Linear and generalized additive modelling revealed that social interaction predicted a greater BOLD response in all ROIs, beyond the effects of the control variables. Face- and body-selective regions in both hemispheres showed heightened sensitivity to social interaction in natural scenes, even during an orthogonal task. These findings expand our understanding of 'social vision' areas beyond individual person perception to include multi-person social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.