Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465403›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

FDA Approval Summary: Idecabtagene Vicleucel for the Treatment of Triple-Class-Exposed, Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Poornima Sharma, Xue Lin, Zhenzhen Xu, Bindu Kanapuru, Marc R Theoret, Robert Sokolic, Lola A Fashoyin-Aje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Poornima SharmaCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0009-0075-7939
Xue LinCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-2645
Zhenzhen XuCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-8597
Bindu KanapuruCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1341-4686
Marc R TheoretCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-5297
Robert SokolicCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0007-2366-3690
Lola A Fashoyin-AjeCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-7813

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On April 4, 2024, the FDA approved idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after two or more prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Approval was based on KarMMa-3, a randomized, open-label trial in 386 patients. The study compared a single infusion of ide-cel to standard-of-care treatment consisting of the investigator's choice of five anti-myeloma regimens. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was significantly longer in the ide-cel arm [HR = 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-0.64; P value <0.0001]. The median progression-free survival was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.8-16.1) in the ide-cel arm and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.9) in the standard-of-care arm. Among the 222 recipients of ide-cel, cytokine release syndrome occurred in 91% (grade ≥3, 5%), neurologic toxicity in 46% (grade ≥3, 11%), prolonged neutropenia in 39%, prolonged thrombocytopenia in 37%, and fatal adverse reactions in 9%. Results from the first and second interim overall survival analyses demonstrated overall survival detriment in the ide-cel arm for approximately 15 months after randomization. Given the increased risk of early deaths in the ide-cel arm, the FDA convened an Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting to discuss the benefit-risk considerations. The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted eight to three that the benefit-risk for ide-cel was favorable for the proposed indication. This is the first FDA approval of a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for this indication.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Cancer VaccinesMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTissue ExtractsAdultAgedDrug ApprovalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntigens, CD19Cancer Vaccinesidecabtagene vicleucelReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTissue Extracts

Identifiers

PMID40465403
PMCPMC12353187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.