ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025
Advanced Electrode Materials for Efficient Hydrogen Production in Protonic Ceramic Electrolysis Cells.
Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preserving a Kinetically-Metastable Nanophase by Limited Calcination for High-Performance Protonic Ceramic Cells.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Electrochemistry for Sustainable and Low-Carbon Technologies: Energy Conversion, Carbon Neutrality, and Green Chemical Manufacturing.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Review
- Advanced Cobalt-Free Perovskite Oxide-Based Air Electrodes for Protonic Ceramic Electrolysis Cells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advanced Electrode Materials for Efficient Hydrogen Production in Protonic Ceramic Electrolysis Cells.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs) exhibit superior proton conductivity under intermediate-temperature operation (300-600 °C), emerging as a promising water electrolysis technology compared to traditional low-temperature proton-conducting polymer electrolysis and high-temperature oxygen ion-conducting oxide electrolysis. However, the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and electrode instability in PCECs hinder their large-scale development. This review highlights recent advancements in PCEC technology, emphasizing its thermodynamic and kinetic advantages, the categorization of advanced electrode materials, and material regulation strategies, including chemical doping, microstructural engineering, and multiphase design to improve their catalytic performance and stability. Additionally, the current challenges are discussed and future research directions are outlined for advanced PCEC electrode materials. By summarizing recent advancements in electrode materials and their optimization strategies, this review provides valuable insights into the rational design of efficient and stable electrode materials, advancing PCEC technology for green hydrogen production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.