ArticleJAMA network open2025
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- Parkinsonism as a Potential Neurologic Immune-Mediated Adverse Event of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Successful use of immune checkpoint Inhibition in a patient with myasthenia gravis and recurrent endometrial cancer- expanding access beyond initial clinical trial eligibility.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Combining Pembrolizumab and Ofatumumab in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Immune-related adverse events in patients with preexisting myasthenia gravis and thymoma following immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a retrospective, observational study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Efgartigimod in the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myasthenia gravis -myositis overlap syndrome: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Life-threatening immune-related adverse events in the intensive care unit: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Myasthenia gravis complicated with autoimmune encephalitis: a review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious in many cancer types but can produce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As such, patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders are often excluded from clinical trials, although subsequent studies have shown that many of these patients have acceptable ICI tolerance. The safety and efficacy of ICIs among patients with preexisting neurologic autoimmune disorders (NAIDs) is not well characterized. Objective: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with ICI therapy among patients with NAIDs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with cancer who were treated with ICIs between October 2013 and May 2023 and had preexisting multiple sclerosis (MS), myasthenia gravis (MG), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and other NAIDs as well as a control cohort of patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Exposure: ICI therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic and clinical characteristics (neurologic disability, active or recent immunosuppression), ICI outcomes (response, progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]), and safety outcomes (NAID exacerbation, irAEs) were collected. Results: A total of 135 patients were included; the median (range) age was 72 (40-88) years, 84 (62%) were men, and 51 (38%) were women. A total of 45 patients had MS; 18, MG; 10, GBS; 5, another NAID; and 57, PD. Exacerbations occurred most frequently in MG (12 of 18 patients [67%]), often resulting in hospitalization (6 [50%]) or death (2 [17%]), with much lower rates in the MS cohort (8 of 45 patients [18%]). Ten patients with a history of GBS tolerated ICI without exacerbations, although 1 developed a fatal case of Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome following ICI treatment. No differences in response rate, PFS, or OS were observed between NAID groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of ICI use in NAIDs, patients with MG had frequent and more severe exacerbations, while those with MS had few exacerbations. No obvious differences in survival between groups were observed. ICI may be an option for many patients with appropriate oncologic indications and preexisting NAIDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.