ArticleCJEM2025
Health system utilization following medical advice from Alberta's Virtual MD: a descriptive analysis.
Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlberta's Virtual MD program was established to enhance nurse tele-triage and divert low-acuity patients from the emergency department (ED). This study describes the use of Virtual MD and its impact on healthcare utilization.
methodsDemographic and clinical characteristics of Virtual MD patients were compared with Health Link 811 callers and the overall Alberta population between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023. Virtual MD recommendations included seeing a primary care provider, going to ED/urgent care, and self-management at home. Concordance with recommendations was determined using linked health administrative data.
resultsVirtual MD patients (n = 19,312) had a mean age of 34.8 years and were mostly female (62.3%). Compared to Health Link 811 callers, Virtual MD patients were slightly older (≥ 55 years) (20.8% vs. 25.0%). Of patients called within 4 h, 55.7% visited primary care within 14 days as advised, 60.0% visited ED within 2 days as advised and 52.5% of those advised to self-manage care at home did not use any healthcare within 14 days. Those advised to seek primary care had a higher odds [OR = 1.65 (95%CI: 1.24-2.21)] of family practice-sensitive conditions when they presented at ED compared to those advised to seek ED care. Hospitalization within 2 weeks was lower for patients advised to see primary care compared to those advised to see ED [4 h callback: OR = 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26 - 0.43), 24 h callback: OR = 0.15 (95%CI 0.08 - 0.28)].
conclusionVirtual MD effectively triaged patients, with over half following through on recommendations to see primary care, see ED, or self-manage care at home. Patients referred to primary care, but instead choosing to visit ED, were more likely to present with family practice-sensitive conditions, demonstrating appropriateness of the initial primary care advice. Overall, the Virtual MD service enables patients to access more appropriate levels of care for their healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.