Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465157›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

Collaboration for Recovery: Expert Mental Health Worker Experiences with the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domain and Stages (RAS-DS).

Hiu Yan Lam, Anne Honey, Justin Scanlan, Nicola Hancock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiu Yan LamSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Anne HoneySchool of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. anne.honey@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-0454
Justin ScanlanSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Nicola HancockSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) was designed as a tool to promote collaboration between mental health workers and consumers. However, many workers use it solely for its other purpose-as an outcome measure - and lack knowledge and confidence to use it collaboratively. The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the strategies adopted by mental health workers who successfully utilize RAS-DS to facilitate collaborative recovery planning. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with expert collaborative RAS-DS users and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants described implementing a range of strategies to facilitate collaborative practice when using RAS-DS. These included strategies to both encourage consumers to complete RAS-DS in a meaningful way and to facilitate discussions about the results for consumer-driven goals and interventions. Findings provide guidance for mental health workers seeking to use RAS-DS collaboratively to support recovery.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorMental DisordersAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCollaborative practiceMental healthMental health workersRecovery assessment scale – domains and stages (RAS-DS)Recovery-oriented practice

Identifiers

PMID40465157
PMCPMC12408720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.