ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025
Efficacy of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure for drug-resistant migraine: initial experience in Japan and long-term outcome.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure for the treatment of drug-resistant migraine in Japan. Previous studies have suggested a potential benefit for migraine with aura, although large-scale trials in the United States and Europe have failed to confirm efficacy as a primary endpoint. The study included 27 patients (mean age 36.4 years, 15 female, 21 with aura) who had more than two migraine attacks per month despite medication. All had PFO confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography and underwent transcatheter closure with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder. Patients were followed up to 12 months with migraine severity monitored by headache specialist. The procedure was successful and without complications in all cases. One patient required a larger occluder (35 mm) due to the size of PFO. At 12 months, 22 of 27 (81%) patients reported either complete resolution or improvement of migraine. Specifically, 10 of 21 (48%) patients with aura experienced complete resolution of migraine at one year. Patients without aura had a lower response rate, with only one case of complete resolution. Despite limitations such as the lack of a control group and potential patient selection bias, the study demonstrated that PFO closure may provide significant relief for patients with drug-resistant migraine, particularly those with aura. These findings support further investigation to better define its clinical indications and potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.