ReviewSpine deformity2025
Musculoskeletal biomarkers in health and disease: implications for the aging spine-a review for spinal surgeons by the SRS adult spinal deformity task force on senescence.
Review in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of spine-related pathologies is expected to increase in developed countries due to ongoing fundamental demographic shifts toward an older population. These changes present significant challenges to public health, as healthcare systems worldwide must confront the burden of musculoskeletal aging and its related consequences. Here, we synthesize current knowledge on the biologic mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal aging, focusing on the implications for the aging spine. The complexity of the aging process, characterized by a convoluted interplay between genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the biologic processes and reliable methods of surveying biologic states to inform effective diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic strategies. Biomarkers emerge as invaluable tools in this domain, offering insights into the early detection, risk assessment, and targeted intervention for age-related musculoskeletal decline. This review highlights various biomarker types including diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic, and explores their distinct roles in enhancing our understanding of musculoskeletal aging. Navigating the interconnected landscape of cellular senescence, sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and frailty, this review underscores the critical importance of developing personalized care approaches for the aging population. By identifying and integrating functional biomarkers, researchers and clinicians can elucidate the underlying mechanisms and devise tailored strategies to alleviate the musculoskeletal decline associated with the aging process. We envision an "active surveillance" future where biomarkers of musculoskeletal aging are integrated into clinical practice, empowering clinicians to make proactive, data-driven decisions that improve spine health for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40465097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.