Observational studyIndian pediatrics2025
Accuracy of 'Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scales Developmental Profile-Infant Toddler Checklist' for Screening Communication Delay in Children Aged 6-24 Months Referred to a Child Developmental Clinic.
Observational study in Indian pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the accuracy of the Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scales Developmental Profile-Infant Toddler Checklist (CSBS-ITC) for screening communication delay in children aged 6-24 months.
methodThis hospital-based observational cross-sectional study included 200 children aged 6-24 months of either sex attending the child development clinic. Participants were categorized into high- and low-risk groups based on perinatal and neurological risk factors. The CSBS-ITC was administered to parents, followed by a standardized developmental assessment using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CSBS-ITC were calculated.
resultsCommunication concerns were identified in 69% of children using the CSBS-ITC, and among these, 65% was confirmed to have language delays on the BSID-III assessment. CSBS-ITC demonstrated a high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (82%), with a positive predictive value of 87% and a negative predictive value of 80%.
conclusionCSBS-ITC is a useful tool for screening communication delay in high-risk children aged 6-24 months, and the tool exhibits good screening accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40465062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.