ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Detection and molecular characterisation of subtype B avian metapneumovirus in commercial chickens and co-infection with bacteria pathogens in Nigeria.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Avian Metapneumovirus: A Narrative Review of Biology, Epidemiology, Transmission Ecology, Diagnostics and Control with Special Reference to Africa and the Middle East.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- First Serological Evidence of Avian Metapneumovirus and Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus in Commercial Poultry in the Ashanti Region of Ghana.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) significantly impacts turkey and chicken production, though its prevalence in chickens is often underestimated due to a lack of systematic diagnostic surveys. This study aimed to detect and characterise aMPV and determine the prevalence of secondary bacterial pathogens present during aMPV infection in commercial chickens raised in three climatic zones in Nigeria. Tissue samples were collected from carcasses of 42 flocks with suspected aMPV cases accounting for 420 chickens. These samples were obtained from veterinary diagnostic facilities in three climatic zones of Nigeria: near-temperate (Plateau, n = 140), rainforest (Oyo, n = 140), and semi-arid (Sokoto, n = 140). Virus detection was performed using RT-PCR to amplify the N- and G-genes, followed by Sanger sequencing. Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis were used to infer the subtypes to which sequences belong. Secondary bacterial pathogens associated with aMPV-positive tissues were isolated and identified using standard methods. RT-PCR results indicated that 11.90% (5/42) of the flocks were positive for aMPV strains. aMPV detected belongs to subtype B. The Amino acids mutations (K183R and H224Y) observed in the sequence obtained from this study differentiate the strain from A, C, and D subtypes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolated aMPV strain (GenBank accession number MZ408311) was closely related to Subtype B strains from Europe and Asia. Prominent secondary bacterial pathogens isolated included Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This study highlights the necessity for enhanced surveillance and targeted vaccination to reduce the prevalence of aMPV and associated secondary bacterial infections, potentially decreasing antibiotic reliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40465030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.