Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465009›Full record

ReviewInternational ophthalmology2025

Analysis of sustainability strategies in cataract surgery and surgeon perspective in reducing carbon footprint.

Pelin Kiyat, Melis Palamar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pelin KiyatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Izmir Democracy University, Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. pelinkiyat@hotmail.com.
Melis PalamarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary objective of this review is to provide a perspective on the analysis of sustainability strategies in cataract surgery and their effective implementation while ensuring patient safety.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify published articles on sustainability and safety in cataract surgery, and relevant articles were evaluated.

resultsThe healthcare sector accounts for approximately 4.4-5.0% of global greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting the importance of sustainability in cataract surgery, which has the highest volume among surgical procedures. The carbon footprint of a single cataract surgery is 181.8 kg CO

conclusionThis review provides evidence that sustainable practices in cataract surgery can be successfully implemented while maintaining clinical safety. The development of research and practices in this field is critically important for establishing more environmentally responsible healthcare systems for future generations. Widespread adoption of sustainable cataract surgery practices is essential for reducing environmental impacts and increasing healthcare system efficiency.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintCataract ExtractionSurgeonsGreenhouse GasesHumansGreenhouse GasesCarbon footprintCataract surgeryPhacoemulsificationSustainability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.