Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464966›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2025

[Difficult doctor-patient interactions in the psychiatric consultation-liaison service: the use of attachment-based models].

Ronald Burian

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronald BurianEvangelisches Krankenhaus "Königin Elisabeth Herzberge", Herzbergstraße 79, 10365, Berlin, Deutschland. r.burian@keh-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the psychiatric consultation-liaison service (CL service) in hospitals a rapid classification of the interaction behavior of patients is often essential for a successful consultation.

objectiveThis article gives an abridged and practical overview of how models from the attachment theory can be meaningfully implemented in the CL service. MATERIAL AND

methodsBased on the relevant literature the foundations of attachment theory are briefly explained and appropriate recommendations for action for the construction of medical relationships are derived. A case study is used to illustrate this pragmatic approach.

resultsAccording to the 4‑category model of Bartolomew and Horowitz a clear classification into 4 different attachment styles can be achieved in adulthood. Furthermore, the derived recommendations for action can be used in the CL service to adapt the construction of relationships. DISCUSSION: Models from the attachment theory can be helpful to establish a functional physician-patient relationship. This is helpful for a successful contact in counselling and these models can also mediate the primary treating physician and contribute to positive medical outcomes.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersModels, PsychologicalObject AttachmentPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationAdultGermanyHumansAttachment theoryConsultation liaison psychiatryDoctor-patient relationshipGeneral hospitalTreatment recommendations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.