ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Prognostic impact of remote myocardium changes using T1 mapping in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRI staging of haemodynamic congestion and clinical outcomes.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic relevance of remote myocardium alterations assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping (native T1 and extracellular volume (ECV)) in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were included in the prospective MARINA-STEMI study. CMR images were analyzed for left ventricular (LV) function, standard infarct characteristics, as well as native remote T1 and remote ECV. The primary clinical endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, re-infarction and new congestive heart failure (Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)).
resultsFour hundred ninety-one patients (median age 58 [Interquartile range (IQR): 52-66 years], 91 (19%) female) patients underwent CMR imaging at 4 ([IQR: 3-5]) days after PCI. Over a median follow-up of 12 months ([IQR: 12-13]) after STEMI, 42 MACE outcomes occurred. Higher native remote T1-times (1018.5 [IQR: 997.0-1064.0] ms vs. 1007.0 [IQR: 977.0-1041.5] ms, p = 0.033) as well as higher remote ECV values (28.07 vs. 26.27%, p = 0.009) were observed in patients with MACE. Multivariable Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that remote ECV (hazard ratio (HR): 1.53 [confidence interval (CI): 1.07-2.19], p = 0.020) but not native remote T1 is independently associated with MACE.
conclusionsA comprehensive assessment of the remote myocardium with native T1 and ECV provides prognostic information in a contemporary cohort of low-risk STEMI patients. Remote ECV, but not remote native T1, was found to be an independent predictor of MACE. KEY POINTS: Question The prognostic implications of remote myocardium changes assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are not fully understood. Findings After STEMI, for patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, remote extracellular volume (ECV) was found to be an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events. Clinical relevance This study underlines the importance of remote myocardium characterization as a promising diagnostic tool. In particular, the quantification of ECV changes in the remote myocardium could be relevant for optimized CMR-imaging-based risk stratification in patients after STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40464914What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.