Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464878›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

A human-AI collaborative framework for surgical field-of-view adjustment: design and experimental validation.

Yuan Gao, Zifan Li, Jianchang Zhao, Jinhua Li, Jianmin Li

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Expertise Transfer Framework For Autonomous Surgical Assistance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan GaoKey Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, 135 Yaguan Road, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Zifan LiKey Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, 135 Yaguan Road, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Jianchang ZhaoInstitute of Medical Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Tianjin University, No. 2 Huake Fifth Road, Tianjin, 300392, China.
Jinhua LiKey Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, 135 Yaguan Road, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Jianmin LiKey Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, 135 Yaguan Road, Tianjin, 300350, China. mjli@tju.edu.cn.

Funding

Tianjin Outstanding Young Scientists Fund Program 24JCJQJC00090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of robotic endoscope holders is to replace human assistants by enabling optimal field of view (FoV) adjustment while ensuring stable visualization during minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, existing systems struggle to achieve this goal, relying either on autonomous strategies that fail to interpret the surgical true intent or on detailed commands that increase the surgeon's interaction burden. Drawing inspiration from clinical decision-making processes, we introduce a novel Human-AI collaborative framework for surgical FoV adjustment (HIC-FoV) to address these limitations. This framework requires only concise voice commands from the surgeon, while leveraging AI to interpret the surgical scene and generate intent-aligned FoV adjustments. At the core of HIC-FoV is a novel multi-dimensional weighting mechanism, which evaluates the surgical scene based on directional and spatial congruence with commands, contextual significance, and perceptual confidence to enable efficient FoV optimization. Experiments conducted on peg transfer and simulated cholecystectomy tasks demonstrated that HIC-FoV achieved performance comparable to manual control (completion time:

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresCholecystectomyHumansField-of-view adjustmentHuman–AI collaborationRobotic endoscope holderSurgical robots

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.