ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
A human-AI collaborative framework for surgical field-of-view adjustment: design and experimental validation.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Expertise Transfer Framework For Autonomous Surgical Assistance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A head-mounted mixed reality platform for robotic flexible endoscope control in minimally invasive cholecystectomy: an animal feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of robotic endoscope holders is to replace human assistants by enabling optimal field of view (FoV) adjustment while ensuring stable visualization during minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, existing systems struggle to achieve this goal, relying either on autonomous strategies that fail to interpret the surgical true intent or on detailed commands that increase the surgeon's interaction burden. Drawing inspiration from clinical decision-making processes, we introduce a novel Human-AI collaborative framework for surgical FoV adjustment (HIC-FoV) to address these limitations. This framework requires only concise voice commands from the surgeon, while leveraging AI to interpret the surgical scene and generate intent-aligned FoV adjustments. At the core of HIC-FoV is a novel multi-dimensional weighting mechanism, which evaluates the surgical scene based on directional and spatial congruence with commands, contextual significance, and perceptual confidence to enable efficient FoV optimization. Experiments conducted on peg transfer and simulated cholecystectomy tasks demonstrated that HIC-FoV achieved performance comparable to manual control (completion time:
Indexed as
Identifiers
40464878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.