ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
Crises and complexity: how can we make health interventions succeed?
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The end of the COVID-19 global health emergency presents an opportunity to reflect on actions needed to enhance the effectiveness of responses to any future shocks. We highlight critical areas requiring attention from researchers and research commissioners to enhance the identification and adoption of 'good value' interventions, and we discuss the complexities of evidence-informed decision-making across multiple sectors, the evolving role of modeling, and the need for improved stakeholder engagement and institutional coordination to effectively address interconnected health and policy challenges. We conclude the commentary by making a set of related recommendations to support intervention identification and implementation. Researchers, policymakers, and other key stakeholders should: renew efforts to step out of silos and to develop methods and frameworks that link and synthesize evidence from multiple sources and perspectives, to support planetary health goals and the 'One Health' concept; support more research into understanding the constraints to adopting interventions regarded as good value for money, to enhance evaluation methods ex ante and to better inform systems and stakeholders of the implementation requirements; and maintain an ongoing commitment to equitable research partnerships to ensure that evidence use is relevant for the target settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.