ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2025
The
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric septic arthritis caused byRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Article
- Patterns, Associated Factors, and Anatomical Concordance of Nasal and ThroatMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- The Influence of COVID-19 on the Composition and Drug Resistance of Pleural Effusion in Shandong Province.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Emergence and genomic adaptation of the globally disseminated ST2250 lineage within theAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Five-decade global expansion of Staphylococcus argenteus ST2250 shapes antimicrobial resistance dynamics.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- Clinical and genomic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Unmasking Methicillin-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- A Potentially Misleading Name:Case reports in infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last 15 years, advances in diagnostic microbiology have enabled more detailed characterization of human bacterial pathogens. These changes have led to the description of new species within the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.