ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Managing hydrocephalus in patients with leptomeningeal disease: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melanoma leptomeningeal disease: Advances in diagnosis and emerging therapeutic strategies.World journal of experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Managing hydrocephalus in patients with leptomeningeal disease: A multicenter retrospective analysis.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) represents a terminal condition of tumor cell seeding that can cause symptomatic hydrocephalus. With improved survival rates under systemic therapy, the role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage through ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) or Rickham reservoir (RR) placement in LMD patients is gaining more relevance. This study aimed to compare outcomes of both modalities in a multicentric contemporary cohort. A retrospective analysis of medical charts in patients receiving VPS for LMD and malresorptive hydrocephalus in two neurosurgical centers between 2006 and 2021 yielded 64 patients. The most common underlying oncological conditions were breast (n = 32, 49%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 16, 25%). The median time between primary and LMD diagnosis was 23.3 months (11.2 to 43.4 months). Symptoms of intracranial hypertension were relieved in 79% of cases (n = 50) after shunting, with 42 (66%) and 32 patients (50%) receiving systemic and intrathecal therapy, respectively. A further multicenter analysis comparing patients receiving VPS with patients receiving RR (with regular tapping) included 155 patients (VPS: n = 80, 52%; RR: n = 75, 48%). Compared to VPS, RRs were associated with a lower surgical revision rate (8% vs. 24%, p = 0.009). There was no difference in median overall survival in VPS patients (118 days) compared to RR patients (80 days, p = 0.180). Given this data showing a short and comparable survival of patients under both modalities with a lower RR complication rate, a rationale for an initial Rickham implantation in LMD patients with hydrocephalus, with later VPS conversion for long-term surviving patients, could be contemplated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.