Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464354›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Perceptual and Motor Processes in Motor Imagery.

Jack P Solomon, Ernest Ng, David A Westwood, Shaun G Boe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jack P SolomonLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-2916
Ernest NgLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5917-5735
David A WestwoodDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3317-0447
Shaun G BoeLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-0049

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/04840-2020Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/04900-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degree to which motor imagery engages the motor system or relies on perceptual/cognitive processes is a continuing debate. Here, we used the size weight illusion to create dissociation between perception and action to address the nature of motor imagery. Participants alternated lifting bricks of equal mass but where one brick was larger than the other, resulting in a perceptual illusion. Fifty-seven participants were divided into three groups differing in the modality used for training (motor imagery, MI; and overt execution, OE) and exposure to the size weight illusion pretraining, one (MI-2) and five (MI-10 and OE) lifts of each brick. We hypothesized that the MI groups would use lifting dynamics post-training consistent with the illusion, whereas the OE group would maintain accurate lifting forces. Contrary to our hypothesis, the OE and MI-10 groups maintained the effect of the illusion post-training. In the MI-2 group, perception of the bricks' weight changed to reflect the participant's belief that large objects are heavy, and they correspondingly adjusted their lifting force post-training. These results demonstrate that perceptual and motor processes are engaged during motor imagery and that the simulation of the motor component of the movement during motor imagery guides the performed action.

Indexed as

ImaginationPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansIllusionsMaleMovementSize PerceptionWeight PerceptionYoung Adultmotor controlmotor imagerysize weight illusionskill acquisition

Identifiers

PMID40464354
PMCPMC12135128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.