Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464173›Full record

SynthesisCurrent medical imaging2025

Computer-Aided Decision Support Systems of Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis - A Systematic Review.

Tuğba Günaydın, Songül Varlı

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuğba GünaydınDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-3715
Songül VarlıDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-6869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe incidence of Alzheimer's disease is rising with the increasing elderly population worldwide. While no cure exists, early diagnosis can significantly slow disease progression. Computer-aided diagnostic systems are becoming critical tools for assisting in the early detection of Alzheimer's disease. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate recent advancements in computer-aided decision support systems for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, focusing on data modalities, machine learning methods, and performance metrics.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies published between 2021 and 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, IEEEXplore and Web of Science, using search terms related to Alzheimer's disease classification, neuroimaging, machine learning, and diagnostic performance. A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing on the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, and biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease classification using machine learning models.

resultsMultimodal approaches, combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography and Cognitive assessments, outperformed single-modality studies in diagnostic accuracy reliability. Convolutional Neural Networks were the most commonly used machine learning models, followed by hybrid models and Random Forest. The highest accuracy reported for binary classification was 100%, while multi-class classification achieved up to 99.98%. Techniques like Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique and data augmentation were frequently employed to handle data imbalance, improving model generalizability. DISCUSSION: Our review highlights the advantages of using multimodal data in computer-aided decision support systems for more accurate Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. However, we also identified several limitations, including data imbalance, small sample sizes, and the lack of external validation in most studies. Future research should utilize larger, more diverse datasets, include longitudinal data, and validate models in real-world clinical trials. Additionally, explainability is needed in machine learning models to ensure they are interpretable and reliable in clinical settings.

conclusionWhile computer-aided decision support systems show significant promise in improving the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, further work is needed to enhance their robustness, generalizability, and clinical applicability. By addressing these challenges, computer-aided decision support systems could play a key role in the early detection of Alzheimer's disease and potentially reduce health care costs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyAlzheimer’s DiseaseComputer-Aided Diagnosis SystemsComputer VisionConvolutional Neural NetworksMachine LearningPRISMARandom ForestSTARD.

Identifiers

PMID40464173
PMCPMC13223504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.