Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464165›Full record

ArticleAging cell2025

Cross-Analysis of Single-Cell Transcriptomic Datasets Reveals Conserved Neurogenic Gene Signatures and New Insights Into Neural Stem Cell Aging.

Oliver Polzer, E Kinloch, P J Lucassen, E Salta, C P Fitzsimons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver PolzerBrain Plasticity Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
E KinlochBrain Plasticity Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P J LucassenBrain Plasticity Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
E SaltaLaboratory of Neurogenesis and Neurodegeneration, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C P FitzsimonsBrain Plasticity Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-2650

Funding

Alzheimer Nederland WE.03-2020-04Alzheimer Nederland WE.03-2020-07Center for Urban Mental Health of the University of AmsterdamEU Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research 6035348Friends Foundation of the Netherlands Institute of NeuroscienceHealth~Holland LSHM20095Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 024.006.009Zon-MW-Memorabel
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal adult neural stem cells (NSCs) contribute to neurogenesis and astrogliogenesis throughout life. They play multifaceted roles in hippocampal function, including memory processing, stress regulation, and cognitive flexibility. Located in unique neurogenic niches like the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus, NSCs exhibit notable heterogeneity and can be classified into quiescent, activated, and intermediate transitioning states. This diversity, while instrumental to their adaptability and function, presents challenges in molecular classification and functional interrogation. Here, we discuss current limitations and compare NSC transcriptional profiles from publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. We address discrepancies in NSC classification between studies, identify conserved gene expression profiles, and propose new markers that could serve as standardized references. Furthermore, we explore how pseudotime inference analyses provide insights into the temporal dynamics of NSCs and their progression toward neural progenitors, further aiming to optimize their classification. We also examine cellular changes in NSCs during aging and explore the potential of these cells to undergo senescence. Our work helps to resolve inconsistencies in current cell-type annotations in literature and proposes a framework to study and classify the different states of NSCs, thereby offering a better understanding of their dynamic roles in neurogenesis, aging, and cellular senescence.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHippocampusHumansadult hippocampal neurogenesisneural stem cellsquiescencesenescencesingle cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40464165
PMCPMC12341800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.