ArticleAging cell2025
Cross-Analysis of Single-Cell Transcriptomic Datasets Reveals Conserved Neurogenic Gene Signatures and New Insights Into Neural Stem Cell Aging.
Article in Aging cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adult neurogenesis: New neurons, new opportunities.Cell stem cell · 2026Review
- ISX9 activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and exerts neuroprotective effects in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hippocampal adult neural stem cells (NSCs) contribute to neurogenesis and astrogliogenesis throughout life. They play multifaceted roles in hippocampal function, including memory processing, stress regulation, and cognitive flexibility. Located in unique neurogenic niches like the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus, NSCs exhibit notable heterogeneity and can be classified into quiescent, activated, and intermediate transitioning states. This diversity, while instrumental to their adaptability and function, presents challenges in molecular classification and functional interrogation. Here, we discuss current limitations and compare NSC transcriptional profiles from publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. We address discrepancies in NSC classification between studies, identify conserved gene expression profiles, and propose new markers that could serve as standardized references. Furthermore, we explore how pseudotime inference analyses provide insights into the temporal dynamics of NSCs and their progression toward neural progenitors, further aiming to optimize their classification. We also examine cellular changes in NSCs during aging and explore the potential of these cells to undergo senescence. Our work helps to resolve inconsistencies in current cell-type annotations in literature and proposes a framework to study and classify the different states of NSCs, thereby offering a better understanding of their dynamic roles in neurogenesis, aging, and cellular senescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.