ReviewOncoimmunology2025
Potent immune-dependent anticancer effects of the non-cardiotoxic anthracycline aclarubicin.
Review in Oncoimmunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Endogenous Myoglobin in Anthracycline Response in Breast Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Re-Arming the Immunological Radar: The Translational Landscape of Dendritic Cell-Centric Nanotherapeutics and Microenvironment Remodeling for Osteosarcoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Athymic murine models can underestimate the immune-dependent components of chemotherapy efficacy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal control of immunogenic cell death: rewiring tumor-immune dialogues for next-generation immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aclarubicin (also called aclacinomycin A) is an antineoplastic from the anthracycline class that is used in China and Japan but not in Europe nor in the USA. Aclarubicin induces much less DNA damage than the classical anthracyclines doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, and the anthracene mitoxantrone, but is equally effective in inhibiting DNA-to-RNA transcription and in eliciting immunogenic stress in malignant cells. Accordingly, aclarubicin lacks the DNA damage-associated cardiotoxicity that is dose-limiting for classical anthracyclines. Conversely, aclarubicin is at least as potent as other anthracyclines in inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD), which is key for the mode of action of efficient chemotherapeutics. This combination of reduced toxicity and equivalent ICD-stimulatory activity may explain why, as compared to other anthracyclines, aclarubicin is particularly efficient against acute myeloid leukemia. As a result, we advocate for clinical studies seeking to replace the anthracyclines used in Western medicine by aclarubicin-like compounds. Such clinical studies should not only embrace hematological malignancies but should also concern solid cancers, including those in which ICD-inducing chemotherapies are followed by immunotherapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.