ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Machine learning-driven strategies for enhanced pediatric wheezing detection.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Auscultation is a critical diagnostic feature of lung diseases, but it is subjective and challenging to measure accurately. To overcome these limitations, artificial intelligence models have been developed. Methods: In this prospective study, we aimed to compare respiratory sound feature extraction methods to develop an optimal machine learning model for detecting wheezing in children. Pediatric pulmonologists recorded and verified 103 instances of wheezing and 184 other respiratory sounds in 76 children. Various methods were used for sound feature extraction, and dimensions were reduced using t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE). The performance of models in wheezing detection was evaluated using a kernel support vector machine (SVM). Results: The duration of recordings in the wheezing and non-wheezing groups were 89.36 ± 39.51 ms and 63.09 ± 27.79 ms, respectively. The Mel-spectrogram, Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC), and spectral contrast achieved the best expression of respiratory sounds and showed good performance in cluster classification. The SVM model using spectral contrast exhibited the best performance, with an accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score of 0.897, 0.800, 0.952, and 0.869, respectively. Conclusion: Mel-spectrograms, MFCC, and spectral contrast are effective for characterizing respiratory sounds in children. A machine learning model using spectral contrast demonstrated high detection performance, indicating its potential utility in ensuring accurate diagnosis of pediatric respiratory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.