ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Quantifying the impact of precipitation fluctuations on forest growth in Northeast China.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the context of climate change, the escalating frequency of global precipitation fluctuations amplifies uncertainties in assessing the impact on forest ecosystem productivity. Hence, elucidating the dynamic relationship between precipitation characteristics and forest growth can provide effective management strategies for addressing climate change. Methods: This study utilizes precipitation data from 1982 to 2022 to construct the frequency and amplitude of precipitation fluctuations and analyzes the response of forest growth in northern China to these precipitation variations. Results: The growth of 13.7% of the region's forest is declining, with 8.1% of the area showing significant degradation. The core degradation zones for forest growth are located in semi-arid regions with precipitation frequencies ≥ 12 and amplitudes ≤ 60 mm and subhumid regions with precipitation frequencies ≥ 14 and amplitudes ≤ 65 mm. In the core semi-arid zone, deciduous broadleaf shrublands have greatest degraded area (2.8×104 ha), but deciduous needleleaf forests have the highest proportion of degradation (57.1%), while in the subhumid core degradation zone, deciduous broadleaf forests have the highest area (1.7×105 ha) and proportion of degradation (9.3%). Discussion: This study not only provides a novel perspective for evaluating forest ecosystem responses to precipitation characteristics, but also offers crucial theoretical support for advancing the implementation of Nature-based Solutions in practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.