ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technological advances in the food industry have garnered significant attention, particularly for enhancing sustainability and reducing food insecurity in Africa, especially in sub-Saharan regions where several million people are undernourished. This increasing demand for food, coupled with consumers' desire for diversity and safety, has spurred innovations like Genetically Modified Foods (GMF). These programs involve altering the genetic makeup of crops and livestock to improve outcomes such as yield, resistance to pests, and overall efficiency. GMF programs constitute several innovative strategies such as technological interventions, including the use of better seeds and pest control methods to combat poor harvests and inefficiencies. Transgenic technology, a key innovation, modifies specific genes in crops to enhance resistance to insects, pathogens, and environmental stressors, leading to increased productivity and efficiency for farmers. Despite these benefits, GMF has sparked public concerns and controversies related to ethics, potential increases in global antibiotic resistance, nutritional quality, toxicity, allergies, and environmental risks. While these issues have generated debate, most studies suggest that the advantages of GMF, such as improved crop quality and resilience, outweigh the disadvantages. This review highlights the safety of GMF, noting that natural gene recombination through selection, breeding, and mutation has long been beneficial. Additionally, it addresses consumer perceptions and the significant concerns surrounding environmental risks and health hazards associated with GMF. Ultimately, while GMF presents promising solutions to food insecurity and agricultural inefficiencies, ongoing research and dialogue are essential to address the ethical and safety concerns raised by the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.