ArticleDigital health
Assessment of health information in Chinese atopic dermatitis-related videos: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the reliability and quality of lupus nephritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the content quality and trustworthiness of snakebite envenomation videos on social media platforms: insights from TikTok and Bilibili.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- The current status and future directions of short video dissemination on urolithiasis via the TikTok platform: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and guideline concordance of neonatal jaundice information on short-video platforms: implications for parental education and newborn safety.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of the quality and reliability of Wilson disease videos on Bilibili, Douyin, and Kuaishou.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Agreement between artificial intelligence and expert evaluation in assessing the quality of asthma health education videos on YouTube and Bilibili: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Physician-dominated yet suboptimal: Evaluating the quality of Meniere's disease information on TikTok in China.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- Quality and content analysis of syphilis-related short videos on Douyin (TikTok): A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Health information quality of gallbladder cancer videos on TikTok and Bilibili in China: A cross-sectional content analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Quality and reliability of Alzheimer's disease videos on Douyin and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is prevalent worldwide. People are increasingly obtaining health information through social videos. In China, the quality, reliability, understandability, and actionability of AD-related videos have yet to be fully studied. Objective: This study proposed to analyze AD-related videos on Chinese video-sharing platforms. Methods: Three keywords "" (atopic dermatitis) or "" (eczema) or "" (atopic eczema) were used on Bilibili and Douyin (Chinese version of TikTok) to retrieve videos from May 25 to November 25, 2024. Included videos' reliability was evaluated by the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), quality was evaluated by Global Quality Scale (GQS), and understandability and actionability were evaluated by Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Spearman correlation was used to explore the correlation among different variables. Results: 368 videos were included, and the activity on Douyin was higher than that on Bilibili ( Conclusions: The assessment of AD-related videos flooding social media is suboptimal. Videos from professionals are more reliable and should be promoted. The public should exercise caution when searching for healthcare information on video platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.