ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Comparative study of effectiveness and safety between non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial decompensation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Endothelial Outcomes and Dislocation Risks in Small Versus Large Grafts for Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the potential effectiveness and safety of non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (nDSEK) and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in treating endothelial decompensation. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients with endothelial decompensation who underwent either nDSEK or DSEK procedures between August 2017 and January 2024. Participants were observed for a minimum duration of 12 months. The study documented key variables like best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial cell loss (ECL), and any issues that occurred during the follow-up period. Results: A total of 85 eyes from 85patients (nDSEK Conclusion: nDSEK eliminated the descemetorhexis step but yielded a comparable clinical outcome in effectiveness and safety compared to DSEK for treating endothelial decompensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.