Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463952›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Engineering skills in the manufacture of tools by wild chimpanzees.

Alejandra Pascual-Garrido, Susana Carvalho, Deus Mjungu, Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Adam van Casteren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandra Pascual-GarridoPrimate Models for Behavioural Evolution Lab, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Susana CarvalhoPrimate Models for Behavioural Evolution Lab, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Deus MjunguGombe Stream Research Centre, the Jane Goodall Institute - Tanzania, Kigoma, Tanzania.
Ellen Schulz-KornasDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Adam van CasterenDepartment of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical evidence of early hominin perishable tools is scarce. However, it is reasonable to assume the mechanical constraints surrounding tool use and manufacture have remained somewhat constant. Using a functional framework to understand the technical capabilities of extant hominoid tool users presents a novel approach to predict the perishable tool-using capabilities of our earliest relatives. We investigated the structural and mechanical properties of plant materials used by wild chimpanzees to make termite fishing probes. Materials sourced from plant species extensively used by chimpanzees produced implements of greater flexibility than those constructed from plants never selected by chimpanzees. This pattern was also reflected in chimpanzee tool species preferences, with preferred plant species producing highly flexible implements. Implement flexibility aligns with functional predictions and likely facilitates termite attachment. Our findings provide insights into the technical skills associated with perishable artefact-making and raise questions about how this knowledge is learnt and culturally transmitted.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesEvolutionary biologyZoology

Identifiers

PMID40463952
PMCPMC12131256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.