SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Status and trends in transcranial magnetic stimulation research: a bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- The Swedish National Quality Register for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with functional near-infrared spectroscopy to elucidate the neurophysiological mechanisms of post-stroke hemiplegia: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as a rapidly advancing non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has demonstrated reliable therapeutic efficacy and significant potential in brain function assessment and research. However, comprehensive bibliometric analyses of the overall TMS field remain limited. Therefore, this study conducts a systematic analysis of TMS-related literature from 2004 to 2023, aiming to facilitate further advancements in TMS research and development. Methods: We retrieved TMS-related literature from 2004 to 2023 in the Web of Science Core Collection. Using CiteSpace and R language, we constructed network visualizations to illustrate annual publication outputs and journal distributions, demonstrate co-occurrence and collaboration patterns among authors, countries, and institutions, and establish keyword co-occurrence and reference co-citation analyses. Results: Our analysis incorporated 6,278 TMS-related articles. Despite fluctuations, the publication output demonstrated an overall upward trend over the 20-year period. Daskalakis Z.J. emerged as the most prolific author, while the United States and Harvard University were identified as the leading contributing country and institution, respectively. Conclusion: Research related to TMS has been increasing annually and is a developing field. The United States leaded the way, while Harvard University was the most active institution. Daskalakis Z.J. (Canada) was the most prolific author. The most influential journals included
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.