Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463920›Full record

ArticleEplasty2024

Bilateral Nipple Piercings and Subsequent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Breast Abscess Formation.

Nicholas W Miller, Zachary A Koenig, Kerri M Woodberry

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Eplasty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas W MillerWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Zachary A KoenigWest Virginia University Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Kerri M WoodberryWest Virginia University Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast infections associated with nipple piercings present a unique puzzle for clinicians because of the lack of sterile regulations surrounding the procedure. As a result, providers must consider wider ranges of infectious etiologies and have a low threshold for initiating broad spectrum antibiotic therapy and operative intervention to prevent detrimental complications. Methods: The authors present the case of a 39-year-old female who developed a methicillin-resistant Results: Management included ultrasound-guided aspiration for the diagnosis and confirmation of the abscess, incision and drainage in the operating room, and both intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy. The patient recovered appropriately without recurrence of infection 6 weeks postoperatively. Conclusions: Given the rise in intimate body piercings, it is imperative to document complications to improve clinician treatment protocols and guide governmental bodies to make this practice as safe as possible.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus AureusNipple AbscessNipple Piercing

Identifiers

PMID40463920
PMCPMC12132597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.