Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463889›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in insect science2025

Tracking sustainability in crop pest management in the United States using an eco-efficiency index.

Madison Love, Roger D Magarey, Brian L Holderman, Danesha Seth Carley, Federico Maggi, Naomi Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madison LoveDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Roger D MagareyCenter for Integrated Pest Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Brian L HoldermanCenter for Integrated Pest Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Danesha Seth CarleyDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Federico MaggiSchool of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Naomi SingerDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While agricultural pesticides are considered essential for global food security, their use poses significant environmental and human health risks. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a science-based framework to minimize these risks by integrating multiple pest management strategies. However, IPM adoption and funding in the United States have been limited, partly due to a 2001 government report highlighting the lack of measurable reductions in pesticide use. To address this challenge, we propose an index based on eco-efficiency, the ratio of agricultural productivity to environmental impacts, to quantify, track, and incentivize IPM adoption. Using crop production and pesticide use data, including both the mass and toxicity of active ingredients, eco-efficiency scores were calculated for ten major U.S. crop groups from 1992 to 2018. The results demonstrate the potential of this index to monitor progress over time and identify shifts in pesticide use relative to crop production. This approach offers a practical, data-driven tool to evaluate pesticide risk reduction, prioritize IPM research and Extension efforts, and support future policy and funding decisions aimed at promoting more sustainable agricultural practices.

Indexed as

agricultural productivityeco-efficiencyintegrated pest managementpesticide externalitiespesticide risk assessmentpesticide use trendssustainabilitytoxicity levels

Identifiers

PMID40463889
PMCPMC12130631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.