ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Resource availability, competitor abundance and specialization affect competition among bumblebees.
Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Spatiotemporal Distribution Patterns and Coexistence Mechanisms of Two Musk Deer Species in Mt. Gongga, Sichuan Province, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Resource availability, competitor abundance and specialization affect competition among bumblebees.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The strength of interspecific and intraspecific competition depends on resource availability, competitor abundance, and specialization. Most studies are conducted with single species pairs, constraining our understanding of what drives competition in multispecies communities. We investigated the effect of floral density, competitor abundance, flowering period, and trait specialization (proboscis length) on the potential for interspecific and intraspecific competition between seven common bumblebee species in the Hengduan Mountains of southwest China. We estimated the potential for interspecific and intraspecific competition using resource partitioning indices in plant-bumblebee networks (Müller's index) over five consecutive years, quantifying changes in floral densities and bumblebee abundance throughout the season. The potential for interspecific competition increased with bumblebee abundance, particularly when floral density was low later in the season. On the other hand, the potential for intraspecific competition increased with abundance of focal bumblebee species and for specialized long-tongued bumblebees, especially when floral density was low. This suggests that resource scarcity regulates species coexistence by limiting abundant species dominance via interspecific competition and intraspecific competition. Our results indicate the importance of intraspecific competition and specialization in maintaining diversity in multispecies communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.