SynthesisFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Predicting alveolar nerve injury and the difficulty level of extraction impacted third molars: a systematic review of deep learning approaches.
Synthesis in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Third molar extraction, a common dental procedure, often involves complications, such as alveolar nerve injury. Accurate preoperative assessment of the extraction difficulty and nerve injury risk is crucial for better surgical planning and patient outcomes. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) have shown the potential to enhance the predictive accuracy using panoramic radiographic (PR) images. This systematic review evaluated the accuracy and reliability of DL models for predicting third molar extraction difficulty and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury risk. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase until September 2024, focusing on studies assessing DL models for predicting extraction complexity and IAN injury using PR images. The inclusion criteria required studies to report predictive performance metrics. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently performed by two authors using the PRISMA and QUADAS-2 guidelines. Results: Six studies involving 12,419 PR images met the inclusion criteria. DL models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting extraction difficulty (up to 96%) and IAN injury (up to 92.9%), with notable sensitivity (up to 97.5%) for specific classifications, such as horizontal impactions. Geographically, three studies originated in South Korea and one each from Turkey and Thailand, limiting generalizability. Despite high accuracy, demographic data were sparsely reported, with only two studies providing patient sex distribution. Conclusion: DL models show promise in improving the preoperative assessment of third molar extraction. However, further validation in diverse populations and integration with clinical workflows are necessary to establish its real-world utility, as limitations such as limited generalizability, potential selection bias and lack of long-term follow up remain challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.