Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463810›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

The additional value of radiology reports in the follow-up of extremity fractures: a retrospective study in an academic hospital.

Mare M H Walraven, Pieta Krijnen, David A Vuijk, Monique Reijnierse, Inger B Schipper, Marco F Termaat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mare M H WalravenLeiden University Medical Center - Department of Trauma Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Pieta KrijnenLeiden University Medical Center - Department of Trauma Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
David A VuijkLeiden University Medical Center - Department of Trauma Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Monique ReijnierseLeiden University Medical Center - Department of Radiology, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Inger B SchipperLeiden University Medical Center - Department of Trauma Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marco F TermaatLeiden University Medical Center - Department of Trauma Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiology reports on radiographic findings during follow-up (FU) after extremity fractures are generally not yet available when the patient is seen by the treating orthopedic trauma surgeon and may therefore be redundant. The aim of this study was to explore the inter-observer agreement on the reported findings of the FU radiograph between orthopedic trauma surgeons and radiologists. Method: This retrospective cohort study included all FU radiographs of adult patients with an extremity fracture, treated in a Dutch university hospital between January 2022 and July 2023. The radiologist's and orthopedic trauma surgeon's assessments of unacceptable alignment, delayed/non-union and abnormalities associated with osteosynthesis material (OSM) on the FU radiographs were collected from the medical files. Fracture healing was considered normal in the absence of these findings. The interobserver agreement of the radiographic parameters between surgeon and radiologist was determined using Cohens' Kappa (κ). Additionally, incidental findings and their clinical relevance were explored. Results: 953 FU radiographs of 569 patients were included. The interobserver agreement was close to perfect for normal fracture healing (κ = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.77-0.88) and delayed/non-union (κ = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.89-0.99). The inter-observer agreement was substantial for unacceptable alignment of the fracture (κ = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.72-0.88) and abnormalities associated with the OSM (κ = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.65-0.89). Twenty-one incidental findings were diagnosed in the FU by the radiologist of which two were also independently described by the surgeon. Three of the findings that were missed or not described by the surgeon could have clinical significance, however the missing of these findings did not lead complications or additional hospital visits. These included two missed rib fractures and one osteochondral defect, which led to prolonged immobilization due to pain. Conclusion: Radiographic reports in the FU of extremity fractures have limited additional value for clinical care and probably lacks cost-effectiveness or efficiency.

Indexed as

Extremity fracturesFracture healingInterrater reliabilityRadiographRadiology report

Identifiers

PMID40463810
PMCPMC12127856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.