Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463783›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025

The Effect of Occupational Therapy Services on Functional Mobility for Patients with Cancer in Acute Care Settings.

Christine C McNichols, Alicia K Peterson, Stacey Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine C McNicholsDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Alicia K PetersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, California.
Stacey ReynoldsDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of occupational therapy (OT) services on functional mobility status for patients with cancer in an acute care setting. Design: Secondary data were used in a retrospective, observational study. Setting: The setting was a National Cancer Institute (NCI) hospital in Richmond, Virginia. Participants: Patients aged 18-93 years of age (51.6% female and 48.4% identifying as male) with 6 cancer diagnoses (breast, blood/hematologic, colorectal/gastrointestinal, gynecologic, lung/respiratory, and prostate/genitourinary) admitted to an NCI over 5 years were included for analysis. There were 1949 patients included for analysis in a paired Intervention: The study analyzed the receipt and intensity of OT services. Main Outcome Measure: Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) 6-Clicks Basic Mobility scores were analyzed at the time of admission to therapy services and prior to discharge. Results: The patients' final recorded AM-PAC 6-Clicks Basic Mobility score was statistically significantly higher than the first session's AM-PAC 6-Clicks Basic Mobility score as determined by a paired Conclusions: There was a statistically significant increase in functional mobility independence for patients with cancer who received OT services in an unadjusted analysis and a non-significant increase in an adjusted analysis of patients' functional mobility. Findings suggest OT services for patients with cancer may influence functional mobility independence.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingHospitalsNeoplasmsOccupational therapyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40463783
PMCPMC12128599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.